Advanced Search
Search

OSTSEE MERCHANT - IMO 8407694

Ship
2,13518
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Jens Boldt [ View profile ]
Captured:
Oct 21, 2012
Location:
Hamburg, Germany
Added:
Oct 21, 2012
Views:
2,135
Image Resolution:
1,680 x 1,120

Description:

Ostsee Merchant seen at Kaiser Wilhelm-Hafen, Hamburg, 21.10.2012

+++ Broken up at Gadani, Pakistan, beached 22.12.2012 +++

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
OSTSEE MERCHANT

Former name(s):

 -  Ghent Trader (Until 2010 Jun 22)

 -  Stamos (Until 2007 Nov 22)

Vessel Type:
Bulk Carrier
Gross tonnage:
35,835 tons
Summer DWT:
63,866 tons

AIS Position
of this ship

There is no AIS Position Data available for this ship!

Would you like to add AIS Coverage?

Add AIS Coverage

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Bulkers built 1981-1990 - 39 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(21)

Pilot Frans

2 photos

bulker

1 photos

Frafo

1 photos

Jens Boldt

1 photos

lys

1 photos

PixelOpa

1 photos

Klaus Kehrls

6 photos

raether

1 photos

bobjak

2 photos

nordwelle

1 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(18)

Newest First
person
Danijela, thanks for your fine comment!:-)

Tuomas, Theo, Igor and Stan - thanks for these interesting links and examples.

Btw... Stan, checked my local shipstore right after work today, no luck, they said it's a discontinued model!:-)

Again, thanks to all for taking interest.

brgds
Jens

Edit
comment

person
Hi Jens, Also available as a tanker. check out your local shipstore for the latest model!

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=508191
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1235440

Edit
comment

person
When I saw this picture I remembered one vessel with the same bow. She is Skipjack (IMO 8615564). She was build at the same shipyard.

Edit
comment

person
Almost a identical bow here,,also when smaller and on a different type vessel
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=181166

Edit
comment

person
B&W builded a bunch and one other building yard in that time> As I understood it it was a kind of trial bow and never really took off more or less like the a-symetric stern which was also hailed as big invention and than more or less nothing more heard from

Edit
comment

person
Very nice photo!

Rgds,
Dani

Edit
comment

person
I guess it's cheaper to build a bow like that instead of a more complex shape. Or, the shipyard couldn't produce a complex one and had to settle with a simplified shape.

Edit
comment

person
Denis
My below comment with very brief explanation was only lighted towards Jen's statement/query mentioned in his comment:
"...I hardly know anything about the construction of a ship's bow in relation to the resistance of water"

Sorry, nothing at all was here related to you or any of your points.

Edit
comment

person
Gianpaolo, now that you mentioned B&W I remembered that I had seen such before, Ocean Beauty (IMO. 8025850).

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=914775

So Ocean Beauty is one of these sisterships?

Edit
comment

person
Just remembered FEDRA (IMO 8208713) also had such bow.

Edit
comment

person
Interesting B/c various sisters deliverd from B&W in 80s
if i am correct 17 sisters
GP

Edit
comment

person
Jadran, you completely missed my point. I know what the bulb is for & how it works. What's interesting on Jens' shot is the whole underwater bow which is literally a mirrored freeboard bow - something I never saw before.

Edit
comment

person
Thanks for this simple explanation, Jadran. Back at school I've already been a failure at physics!:-)

Edit
comment

person
Jens, just to briefly help with a very short explanation.
When the ship is sea-going, a recognizable amount of water resistance is anyhow created on the bulb, but.....
The bulb itself is pushing the water away from the remaining part of the ship's hull. As the remaining hull is a big surface, compared to the bulb, the water resistance on the hull surface, without bulb, would be gross and with the bulb, the hull surface water resistance is much-much less.
Therefore, in final, the total much less water resistance on the entire underwater part of the ship achieves a ship to obtain higher speed.

Edit
comment

person
You could be right, but I hardly know anything about the construction of a ship's bow in relation to the resistance of water.

Edit
comment

person
Perhaps it explains why on all photos of her underway I don't see much bow wake.

Edit
comment

person
Yep, I thought so, too, when I stumbled upon her today...

Edit
comment

person
Veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery interesting bow shape here.

Edit
comment