Advanced Search
Search

HOEGH TRAVELLER - IMO 5021487

Ship
3,93710
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Chris Howell [ View profile ]
Location:
Vancouver, Canada
Photo Category:
Vehicle Carriers
Added:
Feb 23, 2013
Views:
3,937
Image Resolution:
3,223 x 2,069

Description:

Russell Priest owned neg with copright
received from late B.Nicol

Completed 1960 as Passenger Cargo Liner ARAGON
Tons: 20362 DWT: 8000
- 69 ARANDA
[1972 cv to vehicles carrier, 10912gt/10340dw]
71 HOEGH TRAVELLER - 77 HUAL TRAVELLER - 80 TRAVELLER

Disposal Data:
BU Kaohsiung 31.10.81 [Chien Yu Steel Industrial Co]

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
TRAVELLER

Former name(s):

 -  Aranda (Until 1971)

 -  Aragon (Until 1969)

Vessel Type:
Vehicles Carrier
Gross tonnage:
10,665 tons
Summer DWT:
10,340 tons

AIS Position
of this ship

There is no AIS Position Data available for this ship!

Would you like to add AIS Coverage?

Add AIS Coverage

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Vehicle Carriers - 6 photos

Ships under Construction - 2 photos

Cruise Ships and Liners built 1950-1960 - 13 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(6)

Bunts

1 photos

Chris Howell

13 photos

Paul Wille

1 photos

adenanthos

1 photos

jadran

4 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(10)

Newest First
person
You're welcome Chris, that's the reason why we, any and all the members, are on this absolutely *No.1* website !
With your beautiful photos I am proud to be one of the members/brgds jadran

Edit
comment

person
Thanks Jadran

Edit
comment

person
@ Patagualino ... Hello !
The constructions fitted aside/outside on the Main Hull of the ship are so called: sponsoons or blisters.
They are void spaces i.e. void tanks (not ballast tanks).
Their purpose is only to widen/make bigger the ship's width on the waterline.
The numerical value of the ship's width ON THE WATERLINE (better is larger width as possible) is one of the crucial factors in the calculation for the basic ship's stability worthiness.
brgds/jadran

Edit
comment

person
Probably, no doubt a more tehcnically minded member will answer.

Edit
comment

person
Well Chris, They were amazing conversions from fundamentally a good design of a Cargo-Passenger, "semi-Cargo-liner" but that narrow beam & such a high surface area after conversion: would have worried me as a crew-member.....would I be right in thinking those "extensions" are some kind of external ballast tanks on the water-line (Rather like saddle tanks on a submarine?) to improve stability?

Edit
comment

person
Very interesting photo, on first glance it is possible to see that this was not originally a carcarrier, it is very narrow for such one and the funnel shows it as well.

Edit
comment

person
Still better looking than modern cupboards.

Edit
comment

person
HOEGH TRAVELLER was converted (together with her two other sisters) at shipyard Viktor Lenac, Rijeka, Croatia (then YU) beginning 1970s.

Edit
comment

person
They were actually a good design built for a trade that could support both passengers and cargo, ie UK to South America, generally they were well supported with passenger numbers, the killer was the constant delays while working cargo, the same thing that killed them when Shaw Savill operated the three briefly to Australasia, they did however become the best looking vehicle carriers, well in my opinion.

Edit
comment

person
Hard to believe that these unsightly ro-ro conversions were once the handsome Royal Mail passenger/freight liners! how obsolite these combination liners proved to be! mrdot.

Edit
comment