Hi Emmanuel, obvious typo, should be 9. I will not change the post, though, to remind myself to double check when posting. :) When they run out of nines...maybe tbey will invent something better...

Cheers

Vlad

Hi Vlad ,you quoted IMOs 2728916, 2728928 plus the 3 others all beginning with 27, should they read 97------ and not the 27-----? is this a typo? And incidentally when the IMOs reach 9999999 what will happen ?regards

Indeed, Mo Roy: A typo. My bad.

The Evergreen/Costamare ships have a 7/11/4 layout.

The Evergreen/Niki Group ships have a 8/10/4 layout.

Similar Loa - different bay arrangment.

Hi Jan,
Many thanks for the other names.
The Niki / Thalassa ships were 8/10/4 (I guess just a typo).
All these 14000teu ships are 22 40ft bays in length.
Cheers,
Roy

...THALOS
...TAUROS
...THESEUS

The interesting thing about these ships in the revised arrangement, where the wheelhouse is positioned slightly further fwd.

The Evergreen/Costamare ships have a 7/11/4 layout.

The Evergreen/Niki Group ships have a 8/11/4 layout.

Both have a similar Loa.

Safe to assume bulkier hulls, smaller engines, smaller tanks, etc.

Thanks for your comment, Roy. The names I will have to see to confirm them, but the IMO numbers are as follows:

SHI 2121 - TRITON - 2728916
SHI 2122 - TITAN - 2728928
SHI 2123 - ? - 2728930
SHI 2124 - ? - 2728942
SHI 2125 - ? - 2728954

Cheers

Vlad

Hi Vlad,
Thanks a lot!!
Great to see the first of Evergreens 14000 teu'ers with ownership Costamare. So no Evergreen names, same as with the Thalassa class, just a dark green hull.
Also thanks for the other name.
Cheers,
Roy