Advanced Search
Search

STAR EXPRESS - IMO 9311000

Ship
3,24914
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Captain Peter [ View profile ]
Captured:
Mar 16, 2016
Added:
Mar 16, 2016
Views:
3,249
Image Resolution:
1,200 x 1,600

Description:

STAR EXPRESS Plimsolls

Frequently changed position of Plimsoll mark
KS












Vessel
particulars

Current name:
ROSE M

Former name(s):

 -  Star Express (Until 2018 May)

Current flag:
Panama
Home port:
Panama
Vessel Type:
Oil Products Tanker
Gross tonnage:
28,059 tons
Summer DWT:
45,838 tons
Length:
180 m
Beam:
32.2 m
Draught:
12.1 m

AIS Position
of this ship

Last known position:
29°49’55.68” N, 32°31’54.55” E
Status:
Speed, course (heading):
0kts, 283.0° (27°)
Destination:
 - Location:
Egypt Suez Port
 - Arrival:
18th Mar 2024 / 20:00:59 UTC
Last update:
6 days ago
Source:
AIS (ShipXplorer)

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Tankers built 2001 - 2010 - 61 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(28)

Pilot Frans

1 photos

Christian Br

1 photos

Matt Ruscher

1 photos

shipjohn

1 photos

Marc Boucher

3 photos

anstelan

1 photos

Wayne ACourt

1 photos

Moolen

2 photos

J P Byrd

1 photos

John Wilson

6 photos

timbo2

1 photos

Gena Anfimov

1 photos

andrecas

3 photos

nordwelle

3 photos

Owen Foley

3 photos

Marcus-S

2 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(14)

Newest First
person
@64 pacific,, the numbers are exact 10 cm high, if you take 12M = 12 meters, the lower part of it is 12 m draft, the upper line is 12m and 10cm, next number is 20, this would be 12m and 20 cm at the lower part and so on. They have to be standard, otherwise draft reading and by that establishing the amount of cargo carried aboard would be impossible to do.

Edit
comment

person
Very interesting; I am curious about the size of the welded on markings, how tall are the letters? I would imagine the dimensions of the markings are to conform to some sort of standard?

Edit
comment

person
@ Phil,, that makes good sense your explanation,, thanks

Edit
comment

person
Some tankers have multiple load lines simply because owners wish to get the maximum flexibility from their vessels. Certain oil terminals throughout the globe will only accept tankers up to a certain deadweight. So, to get voyage acceptance (usually for timecharter), the deadweight and corresponding draft will be remeasured downwards. This is particularly prevalent in the aframax sector where ships built to 115,000 dwt at full scantling draft are often remeasured down to 109,999, or 99,999 dwt, depending on trading patterns.

Edit
comment

person
Very strange situation for me...
Plimsoll mark may be changed for some reason. but why not to cut off "old" welded marks. it may lead to confusion. The vessel doesn't look like smuggler. If they need to keep less draught, just keep it. I don't see any considerable reason to change plimsoll marking so frequent, that they keep various welded marks for fast repainting

Edit
comment

person
Global warming = raising waterlevel, so maybe therefore the marks need to be ajusted :-)

Edit
comment

person
I experienced the fact of having two plimsoll disk when sailing in a tanker. Only the one in use was painted
The "secondary" plimsoll disk was used when the destination was a Conventional Mooring Buoys terminal which was not able to bear the full displacement of the laden ship. (So, less cargo was taken and the lower summer mark was used).
For that reason, the vessel had to different Load Line Certificates.
This could be a similar case but it is funny to find so many different disks in the same ship.

Edit
comment

person
This is absolutly rare. It should stay here!

Edit
comment

person
SUMMER DRAFT CHANGED FINALLY FROM about 9.80 m. to 12.00 m... SAFETY FIRST ?

Edit
comment

person
All I can say is LOL!

Edit
comment

person
Interesting shot Capt Peter
This is not painted,,this is welded !!! With todays freight rates for tankers,, it makes sense get the max ,,re-measure is then a option if the classification plays along. That seems here to be the case.

Edit
comment

person
I fully agree with my friend Emmanuel.L
I worked for a shipping company (huge now)and it was not uncommon for the crew to re-paint the Plimsoll line markings prior to the pilot boarding before departure. So stupid now in retrospect (we were young and stupid), so dangerous, just to load more cargo...it does not happen anymore.

Edit
comment

person
Photo category: ships deck ?????? surely this is an interesting photo but is a shipside and not a ships deck.

Edit
comment

person
Interesting shot. Why did they change it so often.

Edit
comment