SKOGAFOSS - IMO 9375252
| |||
 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
 |
More Of This Ship |  |
 © Marcus-S |
 © Marcus-S |
 © simonwp |
 |
 |
| More Of: This Photographer - This Ship - This Ship By This Photographer |
Photo Comments (8)
Comments sorting method : |
MattB on Jun 18, 2016 17:49 (4 years ago) | |
| Thanx 4 those interesting answers.@Capt Ted - I wondered if it was perhaps a combo of cranes & deck but more deck strengthening. Would that mean the thickness of the deck plates or the actual tensile strength of the steel? |
|
|
|
Captain Ted on Jun 18, 2016 14:04 (4 years ago) | |
|
Heavy lift vessels to my knowledge or not for example,, over 100 tons it,s a heavy lift or so, it has also to do with the construction of the vessels. Decks are extra strengthened. Ballast pump capacities are much bigger , special heeling tanks are used and a few more other things.
But generally a container ship with cranes , the cranes have very seldom over 45 ton per crane, at least that was the max I had. |
|
|
|
Captain Ted on Jun 18, 2016 14:00 (4 years ago) | |
| Well Pata,, more signs means more safety :-),, at least some peoples in offices seem to think that way. |
|
|
|
omniron on Jun 18, 2016 11:34 (4 years ago) | |
| Strange to see cranes added after building these days, usually it's the other way around ... altho I think she looks a lot better with the gear |
|
|
|
B.Clark on Jun 18, 2016 08:30 (4 years ago) | |
| it looks like they are proof load testing the loading cranes on Skogafoss |
|
|
|
Patagualino on Jun 18, 2016 01:03 (4 years ago) | |
|
Is it just me...or are those ever-present inane messages on the superstructure really necessary?
"No Smoking" "Safety First" ....Surely, by now, everyone that works in or on ships know the rules? I find them so patronising & just so typical of a "Nanny-State" mentality. And just so out-of-date as warnings on trucks: "Caution Air Brakes"....Gosh! Who'd have thought? |
|
|
|
Marcus-S on Jun 17, 2016 19:32 (4 years ago) | |
|
hello Matty,
There is Bold Tern (IMO 9583794) in background. The construction maintenance vessel. Skogafoss in only an containervessel with the two yellow own loading cranes, not a heavy lift. :-) |
|
|
|
MattB on Jun 17, 2016 19:19 (4 years ago) | |
| What constitutes a heavy-lift vessel? I've been comparing this vessel with mv TRAVELLER's technical data. Not much difference in tonnage or length. I guess it's all in the name 'heavy-lift" so it must be something to do with the crane capability I'm assuming. |
|
|
This photo has been shown 1,669 times since it was added to the site.
;){kind=link}