MADRID MAERSK - IMO 9778791
|Photographer:||lappino [View profile]||Title:||MADRID MAERSK||Added:||Nov 09, 2016|
|Captured:||November 09, 2016||IMO:||9778791||Hits:||3,657|
|Location:||Okpo, Korea (South)|
||Ships Under Construction|
|Today's update on the first vessel of the new generation of Maersk Triple E container vessels, supposedly bulkier, slower and uglier than the first series (but will prob'ly make more money, so you know who'll get the girl...) :)
Aft superstructure has been installed, and her hull is being completed by adding the fore part. Floating out is still scheduled for beginning of December, I guess.
|Last known position:|
|1°9’23.58” N, 103°47’24.66” E|
|Speed, course (heading):|
|11.6kts, 37° (36°)|
|Arrival:||14th Oct 2017|
|3 days 3 hours ago|
|Source:||AIS (AirNav ShipTrax)|
|2017 October 14th, 13:00:33 UTC||Cnnbo>mytpp|
|2017 September 29th, 05:30:43 UTC||Hkhkg>cntxg|
|2017 September 29th, 05:30:13 UTC||Cntxg>cnqin|
|2017 September 22nd, 22:00:39 UTC||Sgsin>cnytn|
|2017 September 18th, 04:00:22 UTC||Egsuz>sgsin|
|2017 September 5th, 21:00:30 UTC||Esalg > Egsuz|
|2017 August 30th, 22:30:25 UTC||Nlrtm > Esalg|
|2017 August 26th, 14:30:45 UTC||Be Anr > Nl Rtm|
|2017 July 29th, 01:00:32 UTC||Cnytn>mytpp|
|2017 July 22nd, 06:50:49 UTC||Krpus>cnnpo||
© Justo Prieto
© Juan G. Mata
© Juan G. Mata
Photo Comments (8)
Comments sorting method :
Oh, dear... The Gcaptain article simply copies the original news and STILL manages to get a lot of things wrong :-) (mixing up rows and bays, hull depth vs on-deck tiers, etc.) |
Only been away 2 days and the bow followed by the funnels now fitted. |
Thanks for the picture, Jan, I guess it doesn't look so bad then... :)
Vald, regarding the bays, it will look something like this: https://abload.de/img/jant_shipspotting800eo6zjg.jpg
I prepared this drawing for our weekly newsletter.
Jan, at first I had no recollection of entering "Madrid Maersk", but then I checked the entry form and, sure enough... Anyway, the admins have corrected it.
Roy, the 40' bay sequence of 6+13+5 is unusual, and Maersk is the first to try it. On paper, it looks...weird. I will see, anyway.
I'm sure you keep us updated.
Understand that the (40ft) bay sequence will be 6, 13 and 5 for the new ones instead of the 8,10 and 6 for the 'old' ones.
It will be a long walk from the accommodation to the engine-room.
Please Login to add a comment!
Maersk Madrid? Or did you mean Madrid Maersk? |
This photo has been shown 3,657 times since it was added to the site.