And, not forgetting, a nice series of pics too Brian . . . .

Cheers,
tropic

So on the basis of the comments below, I'll move her to OBO carriers. (a category for which I would prefer the name "combined carriers" , but that is another issue)

FYI, the BANASTAR is currently showing bound for Gladstone with 55,000t of Caustic Soda, so confirming that it is carried in the holds/tanks.

Cheers,
tropic

In addition Mr tropic replied on photo comments http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1368902 i also see in deck office (or CCR) same with tanker ship.

This seems to imply that the seven holds alternate dry/wet/dry.....
http://fairplay.ihs.com/ship-construction/article/4282676/torvald-klaveness-receives-first-of-new-generation-of-combi-carriers

Can it carry liquids in the main holds? Or only in the side tanks?

This Klaveness fleet
When i attend BANASOL and show in ship's particular she is OBO
I think this new generation of their fleet..rgds

G'Day pieter,

I uploaded my shots of the previous generation of Klaveness' CABU carriers to the OBO category. It was the closest category I thought.

Cheers,
tropic

This is a tricky one. I don't think it would fit in OBO's.

Baffin's class society, DNV-GL lists her as:
Type: 220 - Bulk/Chemical Carrier
Main purpose: Dry bulk cargo carriage
Additional purpose(s):
Chemical carriage, non flammable Heavy dry bulk cargo carriage

One of the rare breed of caustic soda/bulk carriers. Any suggestions whether this should be categorised as an OBO, or leave it as a bulker?