Advanced Search
Search

HMS Queen Elizabeth R08 - IMO 4907892

Ship
2,0026
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Robert J Smith [ View profile ]
Captured:
Aug 16, 2017
Photo Category:
Aircraft Carriers
Added:
Aug 17, 2017
Views:
2,002
Image Resolution:
2,000 x 1,333

Description:

Seen approaching Portsmouth for the first time on the 16th August 2017

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
QUEEN ELIZABETH
Vessel Type:
Combat Vessel
Gross tonnage:
65,000 tons
Draught:
2 m

AIS Position
of this ship

Last known position:
50°48’15.36” N, 1°6’1.02” W
Status:
Speed, course (heading):
0kts, 0.0° (181°)
Destination:
 - Location:
Point
 - Arrival:
1st Jan 2024 / 00:00:43 UTC
Last update:
2 days ago
Source:
AIS (ShipXplorer)

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Ships under Repair or Conversion - 1 photos

Ships under Construction - 17 photos

Aircraft Carriers - 68 photos

_ Ship Crests - 1 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(35)

Steve Wright

1 photos

john white

2 photos

paceyms

4 photos

Barry Graham

2 photos

gerrard

1 photos

peter

2 photos

timbo2

1 photos

Dave Forbes

1 photos

Robbie Shaw

1 photos

Gerry Hill

1 photos

Neil Watkin

8 photos

Don Fraser

3 photos

Igor Dilo

2 photos

TARBATNESS

14 photos

Marc Pingoud

2 photos

ray pither

1 photos

Robbie Cox

2 photos

jeffess

2 photos

Andy Ham

2 photos

Rich_D3167

1 photos

coastfamer1

2 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(6)

Newest First
person
With the past debates regarding `Cats & Traps` or Ski Jump, the smaller Russian carrier Kuznetsov, 55,000tons, & her sister ship sold to China, both have a ski jump & operate the naval version of the large Su-27 & smaller Mig 29. There has been talk of buying 15 F-18 Super Hornets costing £40 million each, they would be considerably less expensive than the F35B at £100+ million. Although not as stealthy, the Hornet is larger with a greater range & a mixture of the two aircraft would be a good operational step, also saving money.

Edit
comment

person
Clyde, "getting enough light" was a sore point down there. It was one of the most gloomy days we have seen for a while!
Speaking of island arrangements, I was wondering about the flight deck arrangements. There is virtually a second "runway" on the left side of the ski jump. Previous RN carriers with the ski jumps didn't feature this extra bit of deck.

Edit
comment

person
Nice photographs Bob, I made it down too after leaving home at 4am.

The comment by Emmanuel is interesting, i`m now used to the two island arrangement, it`s logical having the front island for ship control & the rear island for aircraft control, as both islands are in the right place for their respective tasks. Also, the arrangement takes office space away from inside the hull, allowing more space for aircraft, spares, fuel, food etc.

Kind regards,
Clive

Edit
comment

person
Still trying to adjust my mind from the traditional (?) single island design, plus also the 2 islands sited on the overhang of the deck.
regards
Emmanuel.L.(Malta)

Edit
comment

person
Thanks Clyde, well worth the early morning drive.

Regards

Bob

Edit
comment

person
That's a wonderful set for history Bob!

Worthwhile getting up early, but getting enough light.

Edit
comment