Advanced Search
Search

MAERSK GUAYAQUIL - IMO 9727871

Ship
2,17012
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
ventuari [ View profile ]
Captured:
Sep 5, 2017
Added:
Sep 11, 2017
Views:
2,170
Image Resolution:
1,500 x 1,153

Description:

Afternoon arrival. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands.
First time at Santa Cruz port and the biggest one (10.000 boxes) so far in Darsena del Este container terminal (TCT). Really windy afternoon. Slow and complicated maneuver and assisted by 3 tugboats (2 portside 1 aft)
Long shot and nice sun but... sorry for the quality.
Better at Full screen (just 1500 pix)

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
MAERSK GUAYAQUIL
Current flag:
Hong Kong (China)
Home port:
Hong Kong
Vessel Type:
Container Ship
Gross tonnage:
113,042 tons
Summer DWT:
119,359 tons
Length:
337 m
Beam:
48.2 m
Draught:
15.7 m

AIS Position
of this ship

Last known position:
34°44’11.08” N, 7°11’12.07” W
Status:
Speed, course (heading):
14.2kts, 45.3° (44°)
Destination:
 - Location:
Maptm2
 - Arrival:
19th Mar 2024 / 18:30:47 UTC
Last update:
24 minutes ago
Source:
AIS (ShipXplorer)

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Containerships built 2011-2020 - 61 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(12)

Newest First
person
Hi Pieter. Sorry for the late answer but just arrive last night from a trip abroad. Well my friend, I see your point and I checked the exif of one of your shots. You have a Canon EOS-ID Mark IV and your Exif (...software.) dont show the Focal longitude equivalent 35mms. like my Nikon D5100. My Nikon its 1,5 sensor frame factor and in your case I think its 1,3 ( I am almost ¿¿?? sure your Canon is not Full frame). I used on my trip ( shootting just 3 days ago exactly ) an 18-300 mms AF-S Nikkor lens that a friend of mine lent me for checking the exif details, and the result was the same. Exif shows the real FL. 300mms at full and the equivalent in 35mms. FL. 450mms. Another on my shots at FL.120 mms. shows FL.180mms. 35mms. equivalent. May be its something that Canon Exif software dont show, but in my Nikon Exif its there. Even my friend see your shot Exif and compare it whith my one side by side and yours Canon dont show the 35mms equivalent...Really I dont know why...If you solve the mistery pleae tell me.
MBregards my friend.
ventuari

Edit
comment

person
Ventuari, I am aware of the crop factor differences , but on my 28-300 I will get 300 mm exif when I shoot at 300 mm (I use a 1.3 crop factor camera). According to your reasoning, if I understand you correctly I should get 400 mm...that is why I am puzzled about your 450 with a 300.

Edit
comment

person
Hi Brett. Long time my friend. Nice to hear from you. Thanks a lot for your kind comments.
MBregards.
ventuari

Edit
comment

person
Hi Pieter. Thats the DSLR cameras-lenses FL equivalent to the old 35mms.negative cameras-lenses FL. Example. 300mms focal length (with a camera-lens DSLR) = 450mms focal longitude in old 35mms negative cameras. Related to the Frame.
MBregards.
ventuari

Edit
comment

person
Nice picture my friend, all the best, Brett.

Edit
comment

person
Hi Ventuari, I noted on the exif data that the lens was indeed a 70-300, but the distance read 450...hence my question.

Edit
comment

person
Hi MattyBoy. Its a small lens-ring that increase "a lot..." the focal length and its installed between the camera body and the main lens you are using ( if I had a converter, which is not my case, camera body-converter and 70-300 mms.) The definition its like..."A converter, also referred to as a tele-converter or extender is a secondary lens which can be mounted between a camera and main lens. The purpose of a converter is to magnify the central portion of a lenses image area, therefore increasing the focal length". Means your 300 mms can increase to 450 mms or else, depending of the converter you use, relation, capacity and quality...
Thanks for asking my friend.
MBregards.
ventuari

Edit
comment

person
Excuse my ignorance but what does a converter do? I've read up on it but it still does not make sense to me.

Edit
comment

person
Hi Pieter. No my friend, no converter. Just full to the top 300 mms.zoom ( Tamron 70-300 ) Almost half of the frame cropped...Thanks.
MBregard.
ventuari.

Edit
comment

person
Hi Csaba. Thanks. Well, almost 2 miles from my shooting position and bare hands. The problem was the strong wind.
Thanks again for your kind comment.
MBregards.
ventuari.

Edit
comment

person
Did you use a 1.5 converter?

Edit
comment

person
For a long shot it is pretty darn good :-)

Edit
comment