Advanced Search
Search

Carangue - IMO 7914470

Ship
1,9305
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
E. Vroom [ View profile ]
Captured:
Jun 23, 2009
Title:
Carangue
Added:
Sep 18, 2009
Views:
1,930
Image Resolution:
3,178 x 1,808

Description:

23-06-2009
Toulon

some last photos still named Carangue

Year of build : 1980
Call Sign : 9HA2094
Gross tonnage : 1474
Flag : Malta

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
DIAVLOS PRIDE

Former name(s):

 -  Mega One (Until 2014 Jul)

 -  Carangue (Until 2009 Jul)

 -  Pilot Fish (Until 1993 Dec)

 -  Maersk Handler (Until 1992 May)

 -  Smit Lloyd 119 (Until 1982)

Current flag:
Malta
Home port:
Valletta
Vessel Type:
Pollution Control Vessel
Gross tonnage:
1,474 tons
Summer DWT:
2,100 tons

AIS Position
of this ship

There is no AIS Position Data available for this ship!

Would you like to add AIS Coverage?

Add AIS Coverage

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Tugs - 1 photos

Supply Ships/Tug Supplies/AHTS - 94 photos

Ships under Repair or Conversion - 3 photos

Tugs with Tow - 2 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(5)

Newest First
person
Hello

I canot agree with your idea to give [b]Mega One[/b] as title and Malta as flag for this set of pictures taken at Toulon on 23rd of June as until 1st July 2009 she was the [b]Carangue[/b] - French flag and Toulon as port of registry.


She left Toulon on 26th of june to Marseille and stay chartered there up to 1st July. During that time all equipment wher transfered to the [b]Bourbon Apsara [/b] renamed [b]Jason[/b] on 1st July when taking the French Navy charter.

In fact the [b]Mega One [/b] was never at Toulon. She was always [b]Carangue[/b] there.

Thanks for sharing pictures, have a nice days

A+ Xtian

Edit
comment

person
Hi,

Christian have a closer look at the IMO number on both side view photos, would you.
I had her as Carangue myself but the corresponding IMO belongs to Mega One according to LRF. So either you are right and they have a mix up in their database or...?

Equasis says in ship history

CURRENT AND FORMER NAME(S)
Name of ship Date of record Source

MEGA ONE 2009-07-20 LRF
CARANGUE 2000-05-12 LRF

salut,

Ed

Edit
comment

person
Hello

Yes of course there is the same IMO number for the [b]Carangue[/b] and the [b]Mega One [/b] as she's the same ship ! This is the purpose of IMO number : follow the ship even with name change.

And as with your information this number is for the [b]Carangue[/b] from 12 May 2000 up to 20 july 2009 - Then since 2009/07/20 this number is for the [b]Mega One[/b].

As your pics was taken in june 2009 she's the [b]Carangue[/b] your title with [b]Mega One [/b] is a mistake

A+ Xtian

Edit
comment

person
A feel a bit silly I have to explain this. I posted the photo in september.
Posting a photo here means passing it by the IMO lookup function.

To have it fit the IMO at that time, Mega One, was the only name available. I repaired that by stating these were some last shots "still named Carangue" in the text field when i posted them.
So I think thats perfectly clear to anyone reading the text.

Edit
comment

person
Hello

It's just a pitty as for example as I used to sail aboard the Carangue I was looking for a picture of her with her new name and searching with Mega One I found your pics ... With the Carangue !

At the end it still something wrong with this way !

A+ Xtian

Edit
comment