Advanced Search
Search

MAERSK DAKAR - IMO 9302449

Ship
9893
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Justo Prieto [ View profile ]
Captured:
Sep 26, 2020
Location:
Algeciras, Spain
Added:
Sep 27, 2020
Views:
989
Image Resolution:
4,000 x 2,665

Description:

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
MAERSK DAKAR

Former name(s):

 -  Frisia Lubeck (Until 2017 Dec)

 -  Csav Rio Lontue (Until 2011 Apr)

 -  Frisia Lubeck (Until 2009 Sep)

 -  Libra Santa Catarina (Until 2009 Jan)

 -  Frisia Lubeck (Until 2004 Sep)

Current flag:
Singapore
Vessel Type:
Container Ship
Gross tonnage:
25,406 tons
Summer DWT:
33,781 tons
Length:
207.5 m
Beam:
29.8 m
Draught:
11.4 m

AIS Position
of this ship

Last known position:
40°55’19.34” N, 2°59’47.69” E
Status:
Speed, course (heading):
0.3kts, 263.2° (32°)
Destination:
 - Location:
Barcelona
 - Arrival:
5th Jun 2024 / 23:00:11 UTC
Last update:
26 minutes ago
Source:
AIS (ShipXplorer)

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Containerships built 2001-2010 - 141 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(65)

Pilot Frans

6 photos

Stan Muller

1 photos

Tender

2 photos

carimar

2 photos

LPadilha

1 photos

Marie-Anne

7 photos

Ulf Kornfeld

1 photos

john white

2 photos

MO Roy

1 photos

Malte Wulf

2 photos

Pedro Amaral

1 photos

Sven

1 photos

bulker

2 photos

peter

2 photos

Dinie en Jan

2 photos

Jos Telleman

2 photos

Marius Esman

3 photos

Henk Guddee

4 photos

Hein

1 photos

Jens Boldt

3 photos

jens smit

4 photos

Alec Sansen

3 photos

Captain Ted

1 photos

J

3 photos

Ria Maat

1 photos

vazee

1 photos

Lucie

1 photos

nordwelle

2 photos

Netty

1 photos

moinichbins

1 photos

Marcus-S

1 photos

Juan G. Mata

1 photos

Justo Prieto

1 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(3)

Newest First
person
I sailed her as Libra Santa Catarina in 2006. Very nice trade for such vessel in those days. N-EU incl Rdam-HH-ANR and LEH,,down to ARG-URU-BRA and back,,8 weeks one round trip.

Edit
comment

person
Thanks Per and Ian for warning me of my mistake, now it is correct. Regards

Edit
comment

person
IMO Number corrected thank you Per.

Edit
comment