Advanced Search
Search

THE PRINCE OF WALES

< Previous PhotoNext Photo >
Ship
78010
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Ken Smith [ View profile ]
Captured:
Jul 23, 1987
Photo Category:
High Speed Vessels
Added:
Feb 15, 2016
Views:
780
Image Resolution:
1,600 x 1,102

Description:

THE PRINCE of WALES GH2054 SRN4 Hovercraft
Scrapped due to fire 1993 -Service ceased 2000
Departing Dover for Boulogne France
July 23rd 1987

Vessel
particulars

There is no Ship Data available for this photo!

Would you like to suggest new Ship Data?

Photo
Categories

This ship is not assigned to any other category.

More of
this ship(0)

Got photos of this ship? Upload them now!

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(10)

Newest First
person
Yes, like all fully-skirted hovercrafts she has buoyancy tanks under the main deck.

Edit
comment

person
So if the cushion deflated for some reason, would it still float?

Edit
comment

person
That's not correct in my opinion,BobS,she was definitely more quiet in comparison to other turboprop aircraft. Compare her sound to the deafening noise of the Lockheed Hercules or the ear-shattering noise of the Vickers Viscount, both driven by turboprop engines. The Britannia didn't get her nickname without reason.....

Best regards Hans

Edit
comment

person
The Britannia was "whispering" only in relation to the piston-engined aircraft of the time.

Edit
comment

person
However the engines of the Bristol Britannia produced a very smooth sound.... I remember seeing these wonderful aircraft of RAF Transport Command many times and she was aptly called the "The Whispering Giant".

Best regards Hans

Edit
comment

person
The engines were Bristol Proteus turboprops, as in the Bristol Britannia airliner

Edit
comment

person
That's pretty understandable, Bob. The only "ship" here is that they could float! Their pretty compact wheelhouse reminds like how it's on planes, their transmissions between gas turbines via gears & shafts to fans are close to how it's on helicopters. The whole hull construction is more aircraft-like. Also affected by wind, piloting them could be compared to an aircraft as well...
Interesting how back in the 60s in order to make a high-speed ferry the shipbuilders had to jump in to these air cushion exotics, just to realize in few decades the more wise way is to use multihulls!

Edit
comment

person
Denis: At one time these surface effect craft were deemed not to be ships but aircraft!

Edit
comment

person
Probably wouldn't be allowed to run these days, "excessive noise pollution"!!

Edit
comment

person
Wow, excellent photo, Ken! Magnificent ships those were, but sadly, this is the dark past now.

Edit
comment